Matt's Response to an Essay That Teaches Faith Alone and Eternal Security

Matt's Response to an Essay That Teaches Faith Alone and Eternal Security... by Matt1618.

I received an email from a person who gave a detailed response to the Scriptures that I pointed to in my paper "List of New Testament Scriptures that Show You can lose Salvation". To show that I am responding to his full critique, and have not left anything substantive out, I am giving his full critique, its own url. Here is his paper that critiques me: "Proof from Scripture for Faith Alone & Eternal Security". For the most part, he gave a detailed analysis showing why he believes in both faith alone, and how salvation is secured, and if one is truly a believer, he will never lose salvation. He believes the once saved, always saved, teaching. He gives Scriptures which he says guarantees that no one truly saved, will ever lose salvation. I respond to the first part of this paper here. So, this paper will deal with his belief on faith alone as the means of salvation, as opposed to the Catholic view on Faith and grace inspired works/obedience is necessary for salvation. He also gives Scriptures which to him proves eternal security. I will analyze the Scriptures that he presents, and will highlight some passages that prove grace aided obedience/works must be included with faith and that one can lose salvation. I have created a part two, which goes over the Scriptures which I assert prove that one can lose salvation where he interprets as not teaching so. That is gone over here: "Matt's Response to a Critique of My Interpretation of Verses Which Teach That One Can Lose Salvation" . In this paper here, however, I will respond in detail to his assertions that Scripture teaches faith alone and eternal security. His writing is in green, my response is blue, and the Scriptures that I point to will be in black.
Hi Matt1618,
I got hold of one of your articles on "List of New Testament Scriptures that Show You can lose Salvation".

I believe salvation is available to all; but not everyone will be saved mostly because they fail to take God at His word which is conveyed in much of the scriptures that you quoted, which I believe that the reason you quoted these verses is because you made up your mind that all of these so called believers are genuine believers of which there is no way to know because most so called "believers" might be perceived by others as being true believers. Even some verses that are quoted in scripture state that some of this "believers" were never believers to begin with. If you can prove to me that all of these verses pertain to "genuine believers" then I would have no reason not to accept your premise. I hope you will read below to see where and why I am basing my beliefs on.

I will be glad to address these issues, and I appreciate the time you put into writing this. Actually, if I show just one time, any of these passages is speaking of believers, that would be enough to establish that one can lose salvation. However, there is an abundance of such passages.

I hope that you can respond to some of the questions that I have or get your perspective or your comments on where you believe that I may be misled, because I consider everyone's opinion or belief as to where they are coming from or simply put; where are they getting their scripture knowledge, which If it is different I would consider it to be different from my perspective. So hopefully you can enlighten me on this topic so as to help me, in my spiritual walk.

For starters; respectfully, I believe one of us is not in tune with scripture when you state that works are necessary for salvation and you quote Matthew 25:31-46 as one of a few other verses that you quote in scriptures to support your belief that works are necessary for salvation. In verse 23 it ends by saying "faithful" servant. Faithful servant is one who is righteous in God's eye; one who is made righteous by faith alone and not works. Now I understand that you might say his works of what he did with his talents is what made him righteous.

You point to verse 23. It says nothing about one made righteous by faith alone, besides, I'm talking about the passage Matthew 25:31-46. But since you brought up this parable prior, verses 14-30, it is another one that shows one can lose salvation. Those in question are all servants, and the Master represents God the Father, so we know these are followers of the Master. Jesus doesn't call them 'fake' or 'so-called' servants. Wicket and slothful, but still servants. The people in question are believers, not fake believers. Now, in verses 21 and 23, the ones who are faithful and wise servants, are the ones who actually did something. The one who did nothing, vs. 26, just because he was negligent, is cast into hell with gnashing of teeth (v. 30). It matches what it says in Hebrews 2:3: how shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard him. Just neglecting leads to damnation. Jesus is talking about servants, so he starts off in the same position as the others mentioned.

I'll look at Matthew 25:31-46 with your comments down a little further.

But for now, let's look at Rom. 3:28-30 and Rom. 4:5 which are but a few verses that specifically state that faith alone without deeds (works) is what justifies a person (makes him or her righteous).
Romans 3:28-30 does not say faith alone. It says faith, but faith apart from 'works of the law.' Now, in 3:20 it also says works of the law do not save. That is correct. We are under grace, Romans 6:14. No one just 'fulfills' the law and earns justification. Now works of the law is any law in and of itself, be it the Mosaic Law, such as circumcision in this passage, or where man attempts to earn justification, by trying to keep the moral law on one's own power (Romans 3:20), and makes it so one can 'boast' before God. But in this specific section in Romans 3:37-31, Paul writes about circumcision as not putting one right with God:

27 Then what becomes of our boasting It is excluded. On what principle? On the principle of works? No, but on the principle of faith. 28 For we hold that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law. 29 Or is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30 since God is one; and he will justify the circumcised on the ground of their faith and the uncircumcised through their faith.
One can not boast before God. Now, in v. 28-30 his focus is that works of the law include circumcision. Jews were boasting that they were circumcised, superior to Gentiles. That is why Paul complains about their boasting. The main difference between Jews and Gentiles was circumcision. Paul is talking about circumcision and uncircumcision, having been circumcised does not justify. He is not excluding works done in grace. Otherwise he is contradicting himself when he spoke of works actually justifying in Romans 2:6-13, which I will look at a little bit below. I will also look at Romans 4:5, and the context, further down.

Now, going to back to Matthew 25, you argue:

This whole chapter 25, deals with an exhortation to the Jewish people them and for them to beware of how they treat their brethren. In verse 46 it ends with the " righteous" will inherit eternal life. You do not become righteous by doing good deeds, but only by having true faith.
Jesus here is not only speaking about Jews, starting in vv. 31-32:
31 When the Son of man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. 32 Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats,
All the nations are mentioned, not all of the Jewish nation. Judgment thus is not limited to Jews, but all nations. Now, in one sense, you are right, you can't do right on one's own. You don't become right just by doing good. The righteousness that one does is based on Jesus himself. We see this by Jesus himself, when he says in John 15:5 - 'I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in me, and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.' Of course, it is only people in Jesus', or God's grace who will do these works that bring salvation. For example, an unbeliever who rejects God (Romans 1:18-25) can't wipe away their rejection of God by doing good. With that said, Matthew 25:34-35 shows Jesus telling them why people are going to heaven:
34 Come, O blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; 35 for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me.'
So, it was faithful action, based on the love of God but also love of man that helped them achieve heaven. They call him Lord, v. 37, which of course means they have a relationship with him.

Contrast that to those who are condemned 25:41-42:

41 Then he will say to those at his left hand, 'Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels; 42 for I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink,
It has here people calling him 'Lord' (v. 44) so these include people who believed Jesus as Lord. Here Jesus gives the reason why they didn't go to heaven. He doesn't say that because you believed, that makes you a sheep, or lack of faith makes you a goat. Works are exactly the distinguisher. In any sense, works are the cause of one's separation. Now in one sense you are right. You do have to believe, and apart from Jesus one can do nothing. However, in God's grace, if one does good, he stays in God's grace, if one does bad, he is condemned. This lines up exactly as Jesus taught elsewhere: John 5:28-29:
28 Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice 29 and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.
This matches Paul's writing in 2 Corinthians 5:10:
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive good or evil, according to what he has done in the body.
So, Jesus and Paul say that it is not faith alone. Everyone goes to heaven or hell, based on what one does or does not do. Sure, with other Scriptures we must know that faith is the background for this, but faith alone does not justify. Jesus makes the separation from heaven based on not just faith, but exactly on what they do. So, thus this passage in Matthew, agrees with Jesus' own words in a much more abbreviated form in John 5:28-29, when speaking about all people, as well. Paul says that all will appear before the judgment we will receive good or evil based on the good or evil we have done. This is speaking to all people.

You quote James 2:14-26. This verse of James, I believe, has been inappropriately used to mean that works are necessary for salvation. What it really is saying: If one is doing evil deeds and they say that they have faith, then where are your good works. In other words; Faith produces good works; but good works do not produce Faith. I will explain more in detail below.
I will deal with your comments on James 2 down near the bottom of this paper. However, just a quick thing, I don't disagree that faith produces good works. You are saying that I am saying that good works produce faith? I do not.

As for Romans 2:6-13 which you also quote to show that works are needed for salvation; I will also have to respectfully disagree with your thinking on this one. This verse quoted is also an exhortation to the Jewish nation to lead a Godly life. I will go more into detail on why I believe that Faith alone plus nothing else is necessary for salvation. True faith is the core of eternal salvation.
Paul is writing in Romans 2 about justification of Jews and non-Jews, Romans 3-4, justification of all with an emphasis on addressing Jewish issues in reference to justification. In James 2, James is saying that good works done in grace is salvific. Paul is not contradicting himself when he speaks in Romans 3-4, or Romans 1 through 16. All of Romans 1-16 is speaking to a Jewish Christian audience, but he specifically speaks of non-Jews as well. What he says is this in Romans 2, I'll go back a couple of verses to flesh it out a little, Romans 2:4-13:

4 Or do you presume upon the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience? Do you not know that God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? 5 But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God's righteous judgment will be revealed. 6 For he will render to every man according to his works: 7 to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; 8 but for those who are factious and do not obey the truth, but obey wickedness, there will be wrath and fury. 9 There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, 10 but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. 11 For God shows no partiality. 12 All who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. 13 For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified.
Paul is speaking to the Jews right here. Verse 4 exactly shows that it is God's grace, goodness and kindness that we come to faith. It is God's kindness that leads us to repentance. Then that lays the foundation for what Paul says in the following verses. Paul writes 'for' He renders judgment on us based upon our works (v. 6). When he writes 'for' it points back to what he wrote previously, verse 4. So, it is just as 2 Cor. 5:10 said, he renders according to works, of course, backed by faith in God's kindness. Those who are patient and well-doing, are rewarded with eternal life (v. 7). This is a description of the 'cause' of eternal life. Certainly not faith alone. Those who do evil, get tribulation and distress: i.e., hell (v. 8-9). He repeats it in v. 10, saying the same with Jew and Greek, not merely speaking of Jews only. Not the hearers of the law, but the doers of such law will be justified, v.13. Now, it is not the law as spoken in Romans 6:14, but the law of the Spirit, Romans 8:2, which we will see. It is based on God's kindness and those who do good, go to heaven, those who do bad, go to hell, exactly as Jesus said in Matthew 25:31-46, John 5:28-29, and Paul writes in 2 Cor. 5:10.

To show even further Paul is not speaking only about Jews in Romans 2, he writes the following:

14 When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them.
They have a law on their hearts, that they can abide by now. He follows this writing about Gentiles in v. 27:
27 Then those who are physically uncircumcised but keep the law will condemn you who have the written code and circumcision but break the law.
They can keep the law within their heart without being circumcised. When Paul is writing about the code that Jews go by, it is the Mosaic law with all its regulations that Jews went by. Paul will later say that going by those laws and regulations will not save. However, the Gentiles can be circumcised in the heart, and still be responsive to God's grace, and keep the law to God's satisfaction. Paul will later write that works of the law do not justify, but the law of the Spirit is what we live by (Romans 8:2), and the righteous requirement of the law is met through us (Rom. 8:4). Paul is not speaking only of faith. Paul writes glory and honor (Romans 2:10) are given to Gentiles, or the Greeks based on their 'doing good.' So that is how the doers of the law (within grace, v. 4) are justified. So, not faith alone.
Paul, our apostle as reference in (Rom.11:13; 1Tim; 2:7; 2Tim. 1:11), puts it very plainly on what it takes to be saved on his epistles, especially in Eph. 2:8-9. It is so plainly written that anyone can comprehend it, but yet, some do not. Why?
Ok, Paul is a writer on justification, but so are Jesus' words, Hebrews, Peter, John, James. Paul is not the only one who writes/speaks, on justification. He is more extensive, no doubt. Now, I have written on Ephesians 2:8-9. That does not prove faith alone. It is usually shorn out of context in a bid to mean that it teaches faith alone. However, the whole context must be given to go over this, to see what God accomplishes in his grace. Is it merely God looking away from sin, covers the sin over with an imputed righteousness, and all you need is faith as long as you truly mean it, and our works have no effect on salvation? Or does God actually make us righteous with his grace, and as a part of that grace and salvation does righteousness follow, as a means of that salvation, and not merely an effect of it.

Here's my study on Ephesians 2. Let us look at Ephesians 2:1-10 to give the context:

1 And you he made alive, when you were dead through the trespasses and sins 2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience. 3 Among these we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, following the desires of body and mind, and so we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. 4 But God, who is rich in mercy, out of the great love with which he loved us, 5 even when we were dead through our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6 and raised us up with him, and made us sit with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7 that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God-- 9 not because of works, lest any man should boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.
I'll borrow/tweak some from that paper here . This whole background to the verses 8-9 tells us a lot. First, Paul explicates that God made us alive, when in the past we were dead in trespasses and sins, v. 1. Before Christ came, and before being made alive in Christ, we were dead because sins separated us from Him. We once lived according to the passions of our flesh, following the desires of body and mind. By our actions, we were by nature children of wrath. So thus, ontologically, we were truly unclean. Both Catholics and Protestants use this verse (v. 3) to show the effects of original sin. Apart from Christ we walk according to our passions. Protestants, especially of the Lutheran and Calvinist mindset, will sometime use this verse to show that man is totally depraved. Man is totally incapable of responding to God. Now Catholics will just say that apart from God we are in a spiritually estranged state, but not depraved. It is not the purpose to go into that here, just point out that the state we were in, we all agree, is truly estranged from God because of sin. As Paul writes in verses 1 & 3, trespasses and sins controlled us, we walked in the passions of our flesh. We did not have God's grace to counteract those passions. Without God's grace, one is not 'declared' sinful, but is ontologically unrighteous before God. That is the state from which we begin our life estranged from God.

God, who is rich in mercy (v. 4), makes us alive together with Christ by grace (v. 5). How is He rich in mercy, by just turning away from how sinful we are and just look at Jesus Christ's perfect righteousness, as faith alone people say? No, He did not declare us alive, He made us alive. By what? His grace. So, verses 4 and 5 show us that there is a real ontological change, not a mere declaration of a change. This is a change of being into an ontologically righteous person. Thus, infusion of grace, in order to make us truly righteous, is specifically implied.

He also raises up with Christ in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus (v. 6). He does not declare us raised up with Christ, we are actually raised up to be with Him. We are now in the heavenly places. We now reign with him. We are not just filthy rags that somehow have a relationship with God in spite of being filthy rags, but someone who is intimate with God the Father based on us reigning with God. Notice that He really breaks the power of sin over believers. Thus, He does not merely make a forensic declaration of breaking that bondage, God actually breaks that bondage.

That is the background to the verses we are keying in on here. Remember grace is what makes us alive together in Him. It detached us from the bondage of sin, according to verse 5. Then we go to verse 8: For by grace you have been saved by faith. We remember that when Paul wrote that we are saved by grace in v. 5, he wrote that this grace made us alive, and separated from the bondage of sin (similar to when Paul wrote: He who has died has been justified (freed) from sin (Rom. 6:7). He has thus already laid down the transformative nature and power of grace. Grace is not a covering, or a mere imputation of Christ's righteousness to our account. This transformation is a gift indeed given to us by God. It originates from God, not our own doing, as Paul writes in v. 8. We can not approach God through boasting, as he writes in v. 9. This shows that foundational to our relationship with Christ is our total reliance upon Him to transform us, not just our own power. Thus, when it says, it is not of works, lest anyone should boast, it means we do not work to earn salvation. It is God's gift to us that ontologically transforms us. If we did it by ourselves, then we could boast. If we approach God through our own boasting and self-reliance, we are condemned (v. 9). When Paul condemns work salvation schemes, he condemns those who approach God through boasting (Rom. 2:17, 23, 3:27, Rom. 4:2). However, Paul never condemns works when done through God's grace as achieving salvation. In fact, elsewhere he says that grace empowered works are necessary to achieve salvation (Rom. 2:4-13, Gal. 6:8-9, 1 Tim. 6:18-19, etc.). Nevertheless, the point here by Paul is that we must approach God humbly and be utterly reliant upon His mercy and grace, before we can approach Him for salvation. We are saved through His power alone. We do not boast about ourselves. But God raises us up to be sons called to holiness. We are no longer controlled by the passions that had controlled us, before grace, Eph. 2:2-3.

In v. 10, Paul continues this outlook on salvation. He writes that we are His workmanship. Our work in his grace is His work in our lives. In v. 10 here, Paul does not write, OK, now I move on to sanctification, and thus, now we do good works to prove that we are already saved, or something to that effect. Verse 10 is not some new category from which Paul digresses from the whole section on salvation. Instead, he now states the kind of works which do profit unto salvation, as opposed to that which does not. We are God's workmanship created in Christ Jesus for good works, according to Paul. Now in His grace and under His mercy, and in His power, we shall now walk in Him. This is what profits unto salvation. It is by grace that we are saved. It is not by works done under our own power. The gift of God which profits to salvation is thus not only faith as mentioned in v. 8, but works empowered by grace as well specifically mentioned in verse 10.

Now directly impacting the subject of losing salvation, Paul explicitly writes the following, Ephesians 5:3-6:

3 But fornication and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is fitting among saints. 4 Let there be no filthiness, nor silly talk, nor levity, which are not fitting; but instead let there be thanksgiving. 5 Be sure of this, that no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. 6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for it is because of these things that the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.
So, he had written that through his grace we have moved from dead in sins to alive in Christ. We are made righteous only through God's grace. However, after that he specifically warns Christians, to stay away from evil. Fornicators, impure, covetousness people, are on path to hell. This points us back to Ephesians 2. What did God do when we were justified in Ephesians 2:1-10? He took us from the bondage of being enslaved to our passions, Eph. 2:1, 3, 5. He took us from that bondage, that is a part of the salvation that he writes of. So, what exactly does Paul write here in Ephesians 5, is that exactly we are not enslaved to our passions any more. If we go back to those passions again, we are no longer saved, according to Paul's definition of salvation in Ephesians 2, because we are back into those things. Ephesians 5 continues, showing that you go back into those things, you are no longer justified, not on the path of salvation. If one still succumbs to the passions again, that defeats the whole purpose of sending Christ to get rid of the bondage of sin. A Christian goes from righteous to unrighteous through these acts. There is no question, he is directing this comment to Christians, not unbelievers. If one goes from Christian to fornicator or an impure person, he will not have any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ. Apparently, there were some once saved always saved people, who thought that once one was justified, they could never be unjustified. Perhaps they thought Ephesians 2:8-9 meant faith alone, by not looking at the larger context of Paul's overall thought, which includes good works and true sanctification, because one is made righteous, not by one's own power but by God's grace. Paul said let no one deceive you because the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience, matching what he wrote in Romans 2:8-9. So, whatever Paul means in Ephesians 2 can't contradict what he wrote in Ephesians 5, which specifically says that if you act in covetousness, fornication and impurity, you will be condemned to hell.

This is in the New Testament, which is what we Christians should go by when it comes to salvation (We are not under the Law which is works), being that it was written to us Gentiles and Jews under the Dispensation of Grace, which we now fall under and not under the Mosaic Law of the Old Testament.
I disagree some because it has only been grace through all history, even in the past. That is why Paul can point to David and Abraham as examples on how to be saved. However, in the New Testament we get the revelation of the man-God Jesus Christ as the Savior. Well, yes, we are strictly not under the law, the Mosaic Law, the Old covenant things like circumcision we are not bound to obey. They only pointed to Jesus Christ is the fulfillment. Law in and of itself does not make one righteous, only God does. However, the moral law we still must abide by. Grace is not just looking away from sins, but it is a power to turn away from sin which can only come from God, which we specifically saw in Ephesians 2:1-10. So though law technically does not save us, the moral law is not done away with in reference to our own justification.

I would appreciate it if you could tell me why you believe that works need to be included for salvation? I'll assume you'll most likely quote from the book of James; but I'll address that also further below. Is Paul wrong? Didn't Jesus did all the work necessary at the cross when He said "it is finished?" I thought finished meant complete. Does it say in scripture that we must complete what He failed to accomplish?
I'll quote from James Paul and Jesus. Obedience is necessary. Jesus said 'If you want to enter life, keep the commandments' (Mt. 19:17). Apparently, he didn't think that him dying on the cross absolved one from having to keep the commandments. To note that he doesn't think it is merely theoretical he notes the following in John:
John 14:15
If you love me, you will keep my commandments.

John 15:10
If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love.

Of course, Jesus did absolutely everything on his part, when he died at the cross. There is nothing more that he needed to do. However, what he did on the cross must be applied to us, that is grace. Jesus died for everybody. Obviously, Jesus thinks that in order to achieve salvation, one must still keep the commandments. Are you saying that Jesus sees his own death, and what it accomplishes, as wrong? He died for everybody, 1 Tim 2:4, 'who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.' Well, both you and I have to believe, unbelievers don't believe, so we know we must do something to appropriate that grace from his sacrifice on the cross. Is believing adding to the finished work of Christ on the cross? I don't think so. If believing is not adding to the finished work of Christ on the cross, neither is obeying, keeping commandments, or good works. It applies what He did on the cross to our very lives. That is the difference between believers and unbelievers. If it didn't matter what we did, there'd be no difference between us and unbelievers. Agreeing with Jesus, Paul himself writes Christ's purpose for dying on the cross, Titus 2:11-14:
11 For the grace of God has appeared for the salvation of all men, 12 training us to renounce irreligion and worldly passions, and to live sober, upright, and godly lives in this world, 13 awaiting our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all iniquity and to purify for himself a people of his own who are zealous for good deeds.
Notice Paul is writing about salvation. What does he say salvation is? To live soberly, uprightly and godly. He died on the cross to purify for himself a people who are zealous for good works. So, good deeds are done exactly in the context of salvation, in the context of the cross. That is his very purpose, to make what he did on the cross to apply to our lives. It is not a mere theoretical thing. This is not merely sanctification but Paul identifies this as the means of salvation. Our purification is central to achieving that. Basically, it is a living out what he proclaims in Romans 8:13
for if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body you will live.
Jesus did everything he had to, but what he did on the cross must be applied to our very lives as Paul himself writes, and is what enables us to put to death the deeds of the flesh. However, if we fall back into the flesh, we die. Paul of course gives the warning, and he is writing this letter to believers.

Besides that, Paul himself writes the following, Colossians 1:21-24:

21 And you, who once were estranged and hostile in mind, doing evil deeds, 22 he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and irreproachable before him, 23 provided that you continue in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel which you heard, which has been preached to every creature under heaven, and of which I, Paul, became a minister. 24 Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church,
Notice that once we were estranged from God, he reconciled us to himself by his death. What does that death do? So, we will only be irreproachable before him, provided we continue in faith. Key word provided. So, it is up to us to continue in the faith, showing it is possible to not do so. Paul's suffering makes up what is lacking in Christ's afflictions.

You said: Does it say in scripture that we must complete what He failed to accomplish? Paul wrote: Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church, Those are not my words, those are the apostle Paul's words. It seems like your position is saying Jesus did something not intended by Jesus himself or Paul. Paul has to complete it for the church. That applies to us as well. He didn't fail, but he failed your once saved always theology. This passage in and of itself destroys the concept of never losing one's justification. So, of course Christ did all he had to do, but what he did must be applied in actuality to one's life.

I've given some passages, will give further down below. Of course, Paul is right. I have a whole study on multiple passages which show that Paul refers to works being salvific, such as Romans 2:4-13. Study on works Paul and obedience. I've already looked at Ephesians 2 and Romans 3, which shows why those passages do not teach faith alone.

Also look at Rom. 11:6; Rom. 4:5 and Eph. 1:13. These are only a few verses that show salvation comes through faith and faith alone without works.
Let's see, let us first look at Romans 11:6.

But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace.
Whenever Paul says that works are not salvific, it is those works done outside of God's grace. When man attempts to approach God outside of his grace, when he attempts to make God owe him salvation, those works are of no avail. This is exactly the works Paul condemns in Romans 11:6. Nonetheless, Paul does not write that faith working through love is not salvific (as he specifically writes that works added to faith justifies, Gal. 5:6). We can see this take is accurate when one looks at the context of the kind of works that he speaks of that do not save, right here in Romans 11. It is absolutely essential to look at the context of his statement in Romans 11:6. Look at the surrounding verses and what he is speaking of when he says works do not justify, Romans 11:2-8: .
2 God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. Do you not know what the scripture says of Eli'jah, how he pleads with God against Israel? 3 "Lord, they have killed thy prophets, they have demolished thy altars, and I alone am left, and they seek my life." 4 But what is God's reply to him? "I have kept for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Ba'al." 5 So too at the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace. 6 But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace. 7 What then? Israel failed to obtain what it sought. The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened, 8 as it is written, "God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that should not see and ears that should not hear, down to this very day."
Paul writes of Israelites, who even though they heard from the prophet Elijah on who the true God was, (Rom. 11:5) bowed their knees and worshipped Baal (1 Kings 19:18). Those who have 'hardened hearts' and have a 'spirit of stupor' (Rom. 11:7-8, cf. Isaiah 29;10,13) operate outside God's grace. I do not say, 'You need to worship a false god and have a hardened heart and those are works that save you.' The remnant had to take a stand with the minority who went with Elijah. They had to not go with the crowd that worshipped Baal, via grace, take a stand, and worship the true God. They had to not fall into the idolatry and sins of those who worshipped Baal. Yes, Paul writes that works done outside of the realm of grace, profit nothing in Romans 11:6. Grace kept them from falling into the idolatry and sins of those who abandoned God. To say that Paul is saying grace inspired works do not justify in Romans 11:6, is ignoring the context. Besides, any kind of work where one attempts to 'earn' salvation from God (Eph. 2:8-9, Rom. 3:28, Rom. 4:2, Tit. 3:3-5), etc. is not salvific. The Catholic Church teaches that no one can earn salvation. Nonetheless, once within God's grace, works, obedience (as shown in Paul's reference to 1 Kings), and holiness are in fact necessary to attain salvation. Every time that Paul writes about non-salvific works, it is always when those works are not done in grace.

Now, from this we know Paul in Romans 11:6 is not saying that obedience is not necessary to maintain our justification. Just look a few verses later, he is specifically speaking to Gentiles such as you and me, (11:13). But he proclaims in 11:22:

Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off.
He specifically was speaking about how most of Israel was disobedient to God, and those Jews who disobeyed, disbelieved Christ, cut themselves off 11:13-20. However, he is talking about true Gentile believers, he says that one will only stay in God if you stay in his kindness. One must obey, not disregard. If you not in the branch/tree, and not in his grace, which a once saved always saved person might say, you can't be cut off. So immediately after Paul writes that works (actually non-grace inspired works) are not the basis of salvation, he specifically writes that one must endure to stay on that vine. We can be cut off, which means cut off His grace, which makes no sense with the once saved, always saved theology. You can't be cut off, unless you were a part of, that tree, which is God's grace.

Next, you wrote look at Romans 4:5. Let us look at the context of, Romans 4:1-5:

1 What then shall we say about Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh? 2 For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. 3 For what does the scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness." 4 Now to one who works, his wages are not reckoned as a gift but as his due. 5 And to one who does not work but trusts him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness.
Notice in verse 2 it says one can't boast based on works. It means one on his own power can't do anything. Works in and of themselves, do not justify. It is only within grace. The works that don't save are the ones that a person regards as due. We can't make God due, that is the specific type of work that doesn't save., and is referred to in verse 4. We've already seen in Romans 3:20-31 that Paul excluded works of the law as salvific. Circumcision does not justify, as we've already seen. When one works within God's grace, as seen within Ephesians 2, it is not from ourselves, we do not boast. He shows exactly that on our own power, our works are graceless/useless, as we've seen from Jesus, that apart from him we can do nothing, John 15:5. We know that Abraham is justified, as Paul quotes Genesis 15:6, before his circumcision which was Genesis 17. Paul shows here that that type of the works of the law, is excluded from justification.

Beyond circumcision, Paul points to Abraham's justification in Genesis 15, showing that justification is a process. When Paul speaks of Abraham being justified in Genesis 15:6, as referred to in Romans 4, he does not mean it is a one-time thing. Why do I say that? Abraham showed he was a man of faith long before this time, already justified. He acted as man of faith before. God makes the call to Abraham in Genesis 12:1-3. He departs as the Lord had said, took all his possessions to the land of Canaan. He leaves house and home to who knows where, just at the Lord's bidding, and are we supposed to believe that he is a pagan? Abraham does many things for God, 12:7, built an altar to God), 13:4, called on the Lord's name next to the altar in faith. Melchizedek king of Salem blesses Abram and says (14:19) "Blessed be Abram of God most high,..." God is already Abram's God. Abram responds by proclaiming God most high, the maker of heaven and earth (14:22). Paul knows well this background to Genesis 15. Abram was a man of faith so in love with God that he did marvelous things that most believers, including me, would pale in comparison to. If he wasn't justified then, who would ever be justified? The view that doesn't acknowledge that Abram is justified in Genesis 12-14, makes justification by 'faith alone' harder than justification by works!!!

17]Hebrews 11 confirms this view of Abram. Hebrews 11:8 reads:

By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going.
Hebrews 11 refers us here to Genesis 12. Hebrews 11 speaks of heroes of the faith, not heroes of the unjustified. What kind of faith does he have, where he doesn't know where he was going, yet goes at God's bidding, if this is not saving faith? Abraham is obedient, just as in the following chapters including Genesis 15:6. We know the Hebrews author believes obedience is tied into salvation because he said previous to this the following about Jesus, Hebrews 5:9
9 and being made perfect he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him
Source of salvation. Obedience is not just something that follows and is extrinsic, just a nice side-effect of salvation. Instead, Hebrews says Jesus is the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him. This is what he says specifically in Hebrews 11:8 about Abraham. So the Hebrews author dispels any idea that he is talking about an unjustified Abram/Abraham when he uses the terminology being obedient is how one is saved, when he uses the exact term towards Abraham, as he uses when describing how one is saved.

In conclusion Abram/Abraham is justified in Gen. 12, Gen. 15, and when we look at James, in Gen. 22, he offered Isaac on the altar to God. James writes he was justified by works in Genesis 22. We'll look at James 2 later. Paul in Romans 4 without making a mockery of Abraham's life is only speaking of another point in justification of him. In other words, justification is not a one-time evert, but a process.

That has always been the case through the ages and up to now. Why? God is the same yesterday, today and forever (Heb. 13:8). There are a lot more verses in the Old and New Testament, along with examples on how faith alone is needed for salvation; but that is for another time.

Having said that, let me get back to your belief that a "believer" can lose his salvation. (I'm proceeding with the assumption that you are talking about "true believers". You and I know that in any church you have "believers" that have not yet attain a regeneration status, so to speak. I believe that once truly saved, (regenerated by the Holy Spirit) you can never lose your salvation. Hopefully, I can prove it to you with scripture, as to why I believe this.

In my list of verses, I was only speaking to the context of those who were believers. Sure, there are people who go through the motions, and are not in a justified status. Those verses that I refer to as showing one can lose salvation do not point to those people.

A. Eternal Salvation: (Romans 4:21)

The simple meaning of Eternal Salvation is that an individual who truly repents of his sin and accepts Jesus as his personal savior can never lose his or her salvation. The theological meaning of eternal salvation is those whom God has accepted in the Beloved, effectually called, and sanctified by His Spirit can neither totally or finally fall away from the state of grace, but will certainly persevere until the end and be eternally saved. Eternal security means that once a person has undergone the real experience of salvation, has undergone a true regeneration experience, that person cannot lose his salvation either by committing a specific sin or by ceasing to believe. That which keeps the believer saved and secured is by the works of the Holy Spirit and the work of God on his behalf, not the believers own works.

Those Scriptures I mentioned show otherwise, but I'll definitely look at more of your presentation. Of course, one is sanctified by the Spirit, but we have free will. However, I do not say that anything a believer does, is of his own power. It is God at work within you. Philippians 2:12-13 Salvation is worked out, but not on one's own power, look at 2:12-16 for the larger context:
12 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling; 13 for God is at work in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure. 14 Do all things without grumbling or questioning, 15 that you may be blameless and innocent, children of God without blemish in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world, 16 holding fast the word of life, so that in the day of Christ I may be proud that I did not run in vain or labor in vain.
It is not either God or me it is God working through me. If it was guaranteed, there'd be no need to fear and tremble. Also, notice that this is done so we can become blameless. Faith alone people say that one already is blameless because they get covered over with an imputed righteousness. That is foreign to Paul here as he says we must work, of course God's power within the Christian. We must work to stay apart from this world of sin. The only way that the believer achieves salvation is if he holds fast the word of life. So, it is conditional, not guaranteed. If they don't, and it is a real possibility that they don't, Paul would have run in vain for his brothers in the faith. If those believers were guaranteed salvation, it would be impossible for Paul to have run in vain.

B. LET'S LOOK AT SOME PRINICIPLES OF ETERNAL SALVATION:

1. SALVATION IS NOT REPEATABLE.

In the Ancient Greek language often the verb "to be saved" tends to emphasize a singular (one) act (John 3:14-15; 4:13-14; 6:35, 51). The point is that salvation is not something, which is repeated.
Final salvation is when one gets to heaven. Final salvation is not achieved, until one gets to heaven. In order to achieve that one must remain in a state of being justified, in a state of grace. Just being saved, or justified doesn't mean you are automatically guaranteed heaven. The multitude of warnings that I showed in my paper, are true warnings. Those passages in John only give meaning when one endures in belief. Near the bottom of this paper I will look at the tenses Jesus himself used in John 3-6. There are tenses, past tense, have been saved, being saved, and will be saved, I'll look at some of those passages a little later. Those passages you refer to in John 3, 4, 6 assume that one is talking about belief and enduring in that belief. Besides that, Jesus himself says, in Matthew 10:22:
and you will be hated by all for my name's sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.
So, Jesus specifically says only those who endure to the end will be saved, i.e. final salvation. Future tense, this one in and of itself, shows the term salvation though it sometimes can use the in the past tense, also speaks that will be saved is contingent on the action of man enduring. Jesus directly implies many will not. All are warned. Luke 8:13 also refers to some who believe for a while then fall away, I will show that later. Only those who endure in belief will the passages spoken of in John 3:14-15, 4:13-14 be applied.
There is not a single case in Scripture that states a person was saved, lost his salvation and then was saved again. That concept is nowhere to be found in Scripture.
Well, I may technically agree with you, but not the way you mean it. It may be somewhat technical, Final salvation actually comes when one enters eternal glory. So, technically, I do not argue that one loses final salvation, as once you go into heaven, you do not get pushed out. To be exact, I am arguing that when one is justified, one is in a state of grace. My argument is that one who on earth is justified can lose his state of grace, and his justification. One can be justified, in a state of grace, and lose that state of grace, and will not enter final salvation, if they stay unjustified, and remain estranged from God, when they die.

To the way in which you mean lose salvation, I do disagree that there is no evidence of a person being saved and never falling from God's grace and getting back to God's grace. One example is Paul's reference to a very passage that you point to that you believe teaches faith alone. One example is David. The very passage that you pointed to in Romans 4:5 points forward to someone we can know from Scripture, exactly what you termed as nowhere found in Scripture. In the first part of Romans 4:1-4 Paul gives the example of Abraham. Now, in showing that God justifies the ungodly, Paul next specifically cites David. Paul writes in Romans 4:5-8:

5And to one who does not work but trusts him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness.6So also David pronounces a blessing upon the man to whom God reckons righteousness apart from works: 7"Blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; 8blessed is the man against whom the Lord will not reckon his sin."
Paul refers us to David's example as to how we are justified. David is being forgiven his sins, and since he is now justified, he will no longer lose his justification over those sins that he had committed in the past. Here Paul refers us to David in Psalm 32:1-2. He had to confess his sins to get rejustified (Psalm 32:4). In Psalm 32:5, he terms those who follow God, godly (no longer ungodly). David rejoices here, (as in Psalm 51) that God is here forgiving him for his sins of adultery with Bathsheba and the slaying of Uriah the Hittite. The time of the events that he is getting forgiveness for is 2 Samuel 11-12. Is this David's initial justification, and no matter the sins, are they covered over? On the contrary, David since his youth knew and loved the Lord. He sang Psalms to God to soothe Saul. In 1 Samuel 13:14, years before 2 Sam. 11-12 and Psalm 32, David is called a "man after God's own heart", a distinction given to NO OTHER MAN IN THE BIBLE. In his youth, David called on the Lord to defeat the mighty Goliath (1 Samuel 17). David showed his love for God by dancing with all his might (2 Sam. 6:14). This shows indeed that David was a true child of God before the events of 2 Sam. 11-12.

Though a true child of God, he committed major sins (per 1 John 5:17, Gal. 5:19, 1 Cor. 6:9, Gal. 5:5) with Bathsheba (adultery) and Uriah (arranged for his death) to make him become ungodly (2 Sam.11-12). He disinherited himself. He went from justified to unjustified. Now, this man of God who had been a radical believer in God, but turned away from God, committed these major sins. That is how he could be called ungodly coming into Psalm 32 (and thus termed ungodly in Romans 4:5). How was he forgiven? By sincere repentance given in the grace of God. He didn't earn his way back through law. This shows that any idea that God won't take into account sins and one can not get disinherited by future sins, is false. The fact is David earlier was justified, he lost his justification through mortal sin. Yes, once you are forgiven, those sins won't cause you to lose your justification again, but the fact is that David had lost his justification and had to have his sins blotted out again. The very passage you showed, Romans 4:5-8 exactly shows that one can lose justification, but through repentance can come back and be put back into a relationship with God. When his sins are forgiven, God doesn't hold those sins against him as far as separation from him. Verses 6-7 is not talking about future sins that are forgiven, it is only speaking about sins that have been committed, and one has repented for, exactly as Psalm 32 is showing David those specific sins forgiven for. After all, Ephesians 5, we saw, tells people that if you commit mortal sin, you lose your inheritance, unless you repent of such sins to get put back in God's grace. So, Paul shows David being in grace with God, losing that grace, and then getting justified again.

There is the explicit mention of exactly what you said is not in Scripture. There is no way to get around that. David, a man after God's own heart was justified as a child. He mortally sinned with Bathsheba and her husband Uriah, and became ungodly the exact term used in Romans 4:5, and was unjustified. However, through God's grace, his repentance, he again became godly. Justification is not a one-time thing, it is a process until you die.

Another example, Jesus shows that we are in a Father-Son relationship. He portrays the Father-Son relationship when he speaks of the parable of the prodigal son in Luke 15:11-32. The son is in a relationship with his Father. He is in grace, he is due an inheritance. As this parable is talking about God forgiving a son who comes back, Jesus is speaking about salvation/justification. Jesus starts off speaking about a child, in a relationship with his Father, in grace, verses 11-13. He squandered his inheritance. He shows that one breaks a commandment mortally, by the prodigal son, when he repudiated his Father's gift to him and went into loose living. When the son repented of his sins and came back to the Father, we see the Father come running back to him. He had committed sins with prostitutes (Lk 15:30) and squandered all his money. Now, for those who argue that if you are God's child, you can not lose your inheritance, Jesus teaches otherwise. The other son, guilty of a sin of envy, confronted the Father over him throwing a party for the son who had strayed. Jesus has the Father telling the envious brother not to be envious but to rejoice that his brother, who had indeed sinned mortally and had severed his relationship with the Father, came back. He tells him on two occasions the following:

Luke 15:24, 32

24 for this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.' And they began to make merry.

32 It was fitting to make merry and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.

Ok, so we see Jesus identifying the son, as coming to the Father, Jesus specifically says that the Father, who obviously represents God the Father, declaring the son as dead and came back to life again. The key word in verse 24 is again. So, you can't say that he was not justified before. In fact I heard a once saved always saved Protestant apologist argue exactly that, that the prodigal son was not 'saved' at the beginning so it was just him coming to repentance the first time, so that couldn't be used against the OSAS teaching. To the contrary Jesus said He said he became alive again, so:

1) He was his Son, and thus in his grace, v. 11.
2) He abandoned his Father, was lost, vv. 13-14, v. 24, v. 30. This again shows how one can mortally sin. He was separated from God.
3) He come back. He recognized his sinfulness, and fell down at the mercy of God, vv. 21-26
4) He became alive again when his Father accepted him (v. 20, 32).

Now, we know Jesus is representing this Father as God the Father. So, the son was in his grace, turned his back on his father, and was dead in his sins, separated from him. He totally repented from his sins, and his Father welcomed with open arms. However, he had been separated from him. This parable exactly matches David as Paul specifically mentions in Romans 4:5-8, shows that one in God's grace, David sinned with Bathsheba exactly like the prodigal son, became ungodly Romans 4:5, then he is made godly again, and an adopted son, just as the prodigal. Then for that sin, that he has repented for, is no longer counted against him, as far as separating him from God. The sin with Bathsheba represents repented for sins, which we have seen spoken of in Romans 4:7-8. It never meant, that if the son abandoned his Father again, or if David committed adultery/killed people again, there would be no eternal consequences if they died unrepentant.

It is implied in all the other passages, which warn against falling away, but if one does, one can come back, under God's grace, if one is truly repentant. All of the warning passages that I mentioned point to that, but through God's grace, and repentance, one can always be put back in God's grace.

2. TRUE SALVATION PRODUCES WORKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS

This principle states that TRUE SALVATION will produce genuine works of Righteousness in one's life. Anyone who has been truly saved will show it with some degree of evidence, even though it might be quite small, there will be some evidence. A person is saved by faith alone, but that faith that saves is not alone, it will produce some kind of evidences, some kind of good works. Salvation is not by faith and works, but true salvation is a result of a faith that does produce good works (Mat. 7:17-20; Titus 2:11-12; James 2:14-24; II Pet. 1:5-10).

I don't disagree with all of that, however, language I need to clarify to show in what I agree with. In justification God makes one righteous (Rom. 5:19), so yes, as an adopted son, one will produce good works. We don't work ourselves into initial justification. That is true. However, justification and final salvation are not the same thing. We are put into a state of grace, or initial justification through faith. Now Scripture shows that baptism is what puts you into grace, but that is a whole other thing that is a totally different issue that is not at the crux of this debate. Lutherans for example believe in baptismal regeneration but hold to faith alone as you do. But we agree initially, works are not a part of initial justification. But once in grace, then obedience is necessary to maintain that justification. We are in a race to achieve that final salvation. Final salvation is only achieved when at the end of your life, you die in a state of grace. There is a process to get there that Paul speaks of, one of the passages that I referred to in my work, 1 Cor. 9:24-27:
24 Do you not know that in a race all the runners compete, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. 25 Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. 26 Well, I do not run aimlessly, I do not box as one beating the air; 27 but I pommel my body and subdue it, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.
Paul uses a term for himself that it is possible that he can be disqualified. We are in a race that we must run. He is talking about salvation. The word 'disqualified' is adekimos. This is the same word that is used in terming people 'reprobate' Rom. 1:28, Tit. 1:16, 2 Tim. 3:8, Heb. 6:8, 2 Cor. 13:5-7. Reprobate, cast away, rejected. Paul is worried that he can himself be a reprobate. All of these passages show that these are those separated from God. The background to this passage in 1 Cor. 9 is Paul's goal of winning people to 'salvation', 1 Cor. 9:19-24. For a detailed look at these passages, one can look here: Two Biblical Passages that disprove the error of Eternal Security The reason well, he is only talking about getting less crowns just isn't plausible. I point to that, because it shows justification is a process. We must finish the race.
3. THE TEST OF GENUINE FAITH

What is Faith? Simply put: Faith is accepting God at His word. All Scripture is inspired by God. When a person is saved, he may not know that Jesus was born of a virgin. When that person learns it, he or she will readily accept it. If they deny it or reject this truth, then perhaps they were never truly saved to begin with. Therefore, accepting God's word is a test of true faith. (Col. 1:22; II John 2)

Faith is accepting God at his word, no dispute here. It is possible that someone may not have true faith, but for the most part when someone says they believe, they mean it. Of course, only God can judge whether that person has true faith, but we shouldn't construct a theology that gives the excuse 'he never was saved in the first place' to explain everybody falling away, was never justified. Actually, I've looked at Colossians 1:22, verse 23 which shows verse 22 is fulfilled provided one continues in faith, and does not get shifted from the gospel, it is provisional and dependent again on obedience. The very passage you referred me to shows one can lose salvation.

4. WORKS OF THE BELIEVER ARE REWARDED

The believer does not attain his salvation by works, but a true salvation, a true faith, will result in good works and these works in turn will receive their reward. Salvation itself is not a reward for doing good works, but rather salvation by itself is a free gift received through faith and nothing else. (Heb. 6:10)

I've already given some passages that show that salvation is indeed a fruit of good works, not just after effects. Romans 2:4-13, Mt. 25:31-46. Galatians 6:8-9 also shows it. Hebrews 6 says absolutely nothing about faith alone.

5. THE BASIS OF THE EXHORTATIONS (ENCOURAGE OTHERS) TO GODLY LIVING

The exhortations in Scripture for Godly living are based upon what God has done. The exhortations to Godly living are never based upon the fear of losing one's salvation.

One doesn't live a life just in fear of that. One lives based on divine sonship, Galatians 4. We live as adopted children. A child must still run the race however. Because one knows it is possible doesn't mean one just lives in fear, we are adopted sons. We must work our salvation though with fear and trembling. I presume Paul means what he writes. However, we know that he is a loving Father who wants to mold us to his image.

For example, in Romans 12:1-2: "I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God to present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service. And be not fashioned according to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God".
Nice encouraging verses but doesn't cancel what he wrote just a couple of verses earlier, Romans 11:22:

22 Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off.
Paul in Romans 11 was comparing the Gentiles to the Jews. You can not be complacent like the Jews were. The Jews were assuming that just being Jews made them better than Gentiles. He had noted that graceless works do not save you, Romans 11:6. However, their unfaithfulness made it possible for the Gentiles to be saved. The Jews though still can be saved, if they will believe, the Jews if they get grafted back on can be saved also if they believe in Christ and persevere in faith 11:23-33.
After Paul deals with the theology of salvation and points out that believers are eternally saved, then he basically exhorts Christian living in Romans 12 which is based on what God has done in chapters 1-11. It is not based upon the threat of losing salvation.
So, this passage that you speak of in Romans 12:1-2 follows upon exactly after Paul says that one must continue in his kindness and grace, 11:22-23. How do you do it? By being transformed by the renewing of the mind and on what is good and acceptable. This is exactly what one must do to continue in his grace and kindness.

Romans 2:4-13, spoke of getting heaven or hell based on what we did. Romans 2:23-27 wrote of keeping the law in one's heart. Romans 3 said what was excluded from justification was works of the law, which excluded law based on trying to keep the moral law on one's own power, (Rom. 3:20), and circumcision 3:28-30. With Paul referencing David and Abraham's specific citations and where it was in the Old Testament passages with our examination, we saw justification was a process, Romans 4:3-8. Indeed, it is not something that we boast about, or something that 'makes God owe us' because it is all God's grace and mercy. Romans 6:16-23 shows that we get freed from sin in our justification, not just declared, and it is a process. As a believer, sin leads to death, obedience leads to justification. The fight against sin is an ongoing process, Romans 7. Romans 8 show we still must meet the righteous requirement of the law by the law of the Spirit (Rom. 8:2-4). Our salvation is our dependency on putting to death the deeds of the flesh (Rom. 8:13), and we will inherit only if we suffer (8:17). Moving to Romans 11, we saw disobedient works are of course not salvific, as Romans 11:6 shows. But going to the immediate context of the specific quote in Romans 12, is the exact warning from what you say we don't have to worry about:

The Romans 11:22 passage, the background to Romans 12, Paul is writing this to Gentile Christians does he mean it or not? You don't fall unless one is already standing up. And up means in His grace. He does want to mold us into his image. If we transform into his image, that is the way we don't fall. Does he mean it or is he just faking? He means it. No explaining away a clear passage. We must let Paul inform our theology, not us informing Paul what he means.

The same point is made in II Corinthians 5:15: "and he died for all that they that live should no longer live onto themselves; but unto him who for their sakes works died and rose again".

Here again is the exhortation not to live selfishly, but unto God because of what God has done. The exhortation is based upon God's mercy, not based upon losing salvation.

In no way am I saying we should live selfishly. Our whole basis for doing anything is a love a son has for the Father. One has a healthy fear but one still lives for God, because of the love of God. Just before this passage we saw Paul in 2 Cor. 5:10 write God's judgment is based on our deeds good and bad. Heaven based on good works, hell based on bad works, exactly as Jesus said in John 5:28-29. However, right after this passage Paul says that we live unto him, writes the following, 2 Cor. 6:1-2:

1Working together with him, then, we entreat you not to accept the grace of God in vain. 2 For he says, "At the acceptable time I have listened to you, and helped you on the day of salvation." Behold, now is the acceptable time; behold, now is the day of salvation
It says right after the passage you point to that working together with him, he begs his readers not to accept the grace of God in vain. So, in other words, it is possible to accept God's grace in vain. In other words, he can be adokimas, rejected, if one doesn't work with him. And he says now is the day of salvation. He doesn't say salvation is only the past tense. It is not all wrapped up. Justification is an ongoing process.
6. THE RESULTS OF SIN IN THE BELIEVER'S LIFE

This principle of eternal security points out what sin actually does in the believer's life: sin severs one's fellowship with God (1 John 1:6-7, 9) once one believes he has a "family relationship" with God. When one is born physically, he is born into "a family" and will always be a part of that family. At times, communion and fellowship within that family might become strained and broken because of animosity between family members. The same thing is true in the family of God. One may break fellowship because of one's sin, but he will always remain in that family nonetheless. Sin severs fellowship but does not sever salvation.

Agree that there is a Father-son relationship but there is nothing in 1 John which guarantees once one is in him, one can not separate from God through sin. In the very passage, it says 'If we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins.' If we don't confess, we don't get forgiven. If we don't get forgiveness, we don't have salvation, not only fellowship.

John describes how we are in him. Only if we keep the commandments, 1 John 2:3-4:

3 And by this we may be sure that we know him, if we keep his commandments. 4 He who says "I know him" but disobeys his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him;
Exactly as Jesus said, 'If you want to enter life, keep the commandments'. (Mt. 19:17). Indeed, disobeying those commandments does indeed sever us from salvation. He goes on to warn in the next chapter in John.

1 John 3:11-12 We are urged not to be like Cain, whose sin separated him from God.

11 For this is the message which you have heard from the beginning, that we should love one another, 12 and not be like Cain who was of the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his own deeds were evil and his brother's righteous.
John is writing this to believers. He writes 'we' including himself, surely a believer. Believers are warned not to be like Cain who murdered his brother. This is a real warning. If we murder somebody we get separated from God. However, he goes on to say much more, because most of us haven't murdered people.

John gives more detail on 1 John 3:14-18 here:

14 We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death. 15 Any one who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him. 16 By this we know love, that he laid down his life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. 17 But if any one has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God's love abide in him? 18 Little children, let us not love in word or speech but in deed and in truth.
Not only is a murderer excluded from eternal life, even someone who hates a brother is in peril for their soul. Remember John 5:24 was quoted earlier as giving one eternal security, when Jesus says one passed from death to life when one believed in him, that one has eternal life and it was used to support eternal security, because eternal is eternal. But John says that one who believes has passed from death to life, because one loves the brethren. John next writes about hating a brother. He is talking about loving or not loving a brother. Familial relations. Children can lose eternal life by hating a brother. John heard Jesus say one has passed from death to life, but right here, tells us one can go the other way. This is a real warning.

John later introduces the term mortal sin, which is a sin that leads to eternal death, 1 John 5:16-17.

16 If any one sees his brother committing what is not a mortal sin, he will ask, and God will give him life for those whose sin is not mortal. There is sin which is mortal; I do not say that one is to pray for that. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin which is not mortal.
The whole context is about eternal life, 1 John 5:13, How one must keep the commandments, which is not burdensome (5:3-4). But John makes a distinction in sins. There is a mortal sin, which separates one from God, and sins that are not mortal, which Catholics term venial. Since the context is about having or not having eternal life, John is not talking physical death. John himself makes a distinction. But even if we are children, we can get disinherited by our actions. We can become like Cain, as John specifically warned.

7. PERSISTENT SIN SHOWS A LACK OF GENUINE CONVERSION<

This principle is the point of I John 3:6-10, where the present tense is used. Consistent sin does not show a loss of salvation, but rather that the person was never saved to begin with. Often people point to a person that he walked down the aisle to received Jesus, but has never shown signs or evidence of it because he is still walking in the same steps before he "believed" in Jesus. Merely saying that he walked down the aisle or saying that he believes in Jesus is not proof that he had saving faith. The question is: "Was he ever really saved to begin with? Was he ever really converted in the true sense of the term?" Persistence in sin may show a lack of conversion.

Sure, there may be people who do not really believe, there are some who have fake belief. Jesus affirms that when Jesus says to some 'I never knew you,' Matthew 7:23. That context is not here though. John doesn't write that he is talking about unbelievers. But in this very letter, John warns believers, believers are reading this Scripture, (he even used the term 'we') those in his grace, that they can become like Cain. And one's eternal life is contingent on keeping the commandments. John does not write here, here is for one category of people, 'those who actually believe', and here is another writing that applies for 'those who don't believe.' Since this is a letter to Christians, this is a warning to Christians.
8. PERFECTION IS NOT ACHIEVED IN THIS LIFE

Eternal salvation does not mean that you have achieved perfection as a believer. Believers will be sinning for the rest of their lives. No one will achieve perfection in this life. If one must reach perfection in order to be save or for that matter maintain salvation, then everyone, including every believer is in trouble. If anyone could have made it to perfection, it would have been the Apostle Paul, and yet he wrote, "I am not yet perfect" (Phil. 3:12-14). In I Timothy 1:15, written toward the end of his life, Paul said: "Faithful is the saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of I am chief". Notice that he did not use the past tense: "I was." He used the present tense: "I am."

Well, Jesus does say that is possible he encourages us to, 'be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect', Mt. 5:48. Why does he say that if it is absolutely impossible? Now, of course I am not, most people are not, but that is a goal to strive for. Now, Paul is being humble, part of who he is, is what he did in the past, behind the killing of Christians is still his identification, even if he was forgiven for it. God makes a differentiation in sins, as we've seen, in 1 John 5:16-17, also see, 1 Cor, 3:15, 17, many other places. Shortly I'll look at Hebrews 12. Paul, Jesus, Peter, just in reading Scripture, and what we know naturally, we know there are differences in sin. With that said, Paul did not lie when he writes for example in 2 Corinthians 7:1:
1 Since we have these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from every defilement of body and spirit, and make holiness perfect in the fear of God.
This is not a fake Scripture, Paul even he has confidence in them, 2 Corinthians 7:4. Paul encourages, Jesus encourages us to strive for something that is possible. You see, we can cleanse through the Holy Spirit, and our effort, Paul uses the term 'let us.'

However, this very passage in Philippians 3 shows what you say is guaranteed, salvation, is not: The passage you refer us to shows that we have not achieved perfection but also we are not guaranteed salvation. You pointed to Phil. 3:12-14, let us go back 2 verses, 3:10-14:

10 that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, 11 that if possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead. 12 Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect; but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. 13 Brethren, I do not consider that I have made it my own; but one thing I do, forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, 14 I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
Notice prior to this very passage you cite, it says 'if possible' I may attain the resurrection of the dead. He still has to work out salvation with fear and trembling, and he hasn't made it. He only says 'if possible'. The strongest Christian who is writing this letter says 'if possible', which makes absolutely no sense if one is guaranteed that. He presses on to be perfect, which is a real goal. This is the exact same thing he spoke about in 1 Cor. 9:24-27, where he notes it is possible, he can be a reprobate, he had to box like a boxer, run like a runner.

You brought up the fact that Christians are children of the Father. We are adopted children of God. As he adopts us, he understands that we are imperfect. That is why when in grace, he doesn't need perfection. If one goes strictly by law, one is condemned no doubt for imperfections. However, as adopted children a Father will forgive us for small failings.

Hebrews 12 shows the differences, his purpose is shown. First, vv. 5-7:

5 And have you forgotten the exhortation which addresses you as sons? --"My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor lose courage when you are punished by him. 6 For the Lord disciplines him whom he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives." 7 It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons; for what son is there whom his father does not discipline?
God prunes us, He does this for our growth in holiness when we have shortcomings. He disciplines us. However, we are not required to be perfect. He molds us. Now Hebrews 12:14 declares that holiness is the means of salvation:
Strive for peace with all men, and for the holiness without which no one will see the Lord.
Holiness is not just a byproduct of being saved, it is a means of achieving it.

Next Hebrews 12 shows us one can mortally sin like Esau. He is not writing this to unbelievers, this passage is addressing believers, 12:15-17:

15 See to it that, no one fail to obtain the grace of God; that no "root of bitterness" spring up and cause trouble, and by it the many become defiled; 16 that no one be immoral or irreligious like Esau, who sold his birthright for a single meal. 17 For you know that afterward, when he desired to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, for he found no chance to repent, though he sought it with tears.
Make sure that no one fails to obtain the grace of God. If just one of his readers are Christian, then it shows one can drop out of God's grace. So, though He prunes us to mold us, one can fail to obtain the grace of God. A root of bitterness can spring up, cause trouble and be defiled. Esau sold his birthright for a meal. One can become immoral like Esau. He is writing this to believers, Christian sons and daughters. So, he makes a difference between small sins, which you stay in his grace but need some pruning, and mortal sins, where you can cut yourself off from God like Esau.
9. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POSITION AND PRACTICE

This principle of eternal security is that there is a difference between taking a position on certain beliefs but yet practice something else that does not conform to your beliefs. Perhaps the best example of this is the Corinthian church. Paul referred to the Corinthian church positional as being a sanctified church (I Cor. 1:2). But according to their practice, they are one of the worst churches in the New Testament. There is a difference between position and practice; however, bad practice does not mean that the position has been lost.

Indeed, the Church was sanctified when they came to faith in Christ. He is warning them exactly that position has been lost. All of 1 Corinthians 5-6 is a warning that the position is lost and you have to get rid of the immorality in the church. 1 Corinthians 3, he talks of various sins. In 1 Corinthians 6 he specifically says that you have been washed, cleansed, justified. Look at the implications of the passage, 1 Cor. 6:9-11:
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
Now, read all the implications of this passage. Again, he warns us against being deceived. He is talking about believers we know because he specifically says in verse 11 you were washed, sanctified, and justified. Apparently, there were some once saved always saved preachers that Paul warns against. He says do not be deceived. In other words, the actions of immorality, adultery, drunkenness, thievery, causes those who were justified, to become disinherited. In 1 Corinthians 5, he is talking about the horrible incestual sin.

Later in your essay, in reference to 1 Corinthians 5, you wrote:

The sixteenth area of evidence is the truth of Scripture that gross sins were punished, but never with loss of salvation. For example, (1 Cor. 5: 1-5) describes a case where a true believer is living with and sleeping with step-mother. Paul condemned this, telling the church that it must exercise church discipline to deliver such (a person over to) Satan for the destruction of the flesh. ) NOTICE THAT HE SAYS THE FLESH RATHER THAN THE SPIRIT, because the text goes on to say that the spirit (shall still) be saved. This gross sin was punished by excommunication, but not by loss of salvation.
Actually 1 Corinthians 5 preceded chapter 6, so of course this is an example that culminates in the passage which says that such sins as fornication, adultery, etc. will cause you to be disinherited in 1 Corinthians 6. The warning in chapter 6, exactly applies to the sin in 1 Corinthians 5, otherwise, the warning has no meaning. But let us look at the passage itself, 5:1-5:
1 It is actually reported that there is immorality among you, and of a kind that is not found even among pagans; for a man is living with his father's wife. 2 And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. 3 For though absent in body I am present in spirit, and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment 4 in the name of the Lord Jesus on the man who has done such a thing. When you are assembled, and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
Paul is expressing judgment on this situation. He is in the process of excommunication of the believer. Unlike your assessment, one can not do this sin and still stay in either the grace of God, or the Church. It is a horrible sin that is bringing scandal to the Church, the man is a fornicator. Paul's purpose here, is to let sin run its course, and the Christian turned fornicator, reach full degradation, which will hopefully prompt him to wake up so that he stops practicing this sin, and come back to God, and the Church. Notice Paul's words 'you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus', not 'still saved' regardless. The term 'flesh' used here is the same term that Paul used to say one had to put to death the deeds of the 'flesh', Rom. 8:13. He doesn't, he is hell-bound. If he gives into the flesh, that leads to his spiritual death. Also, this is the same term used in Galatians 5:16-17, which speaks of sins of the flesh that lead, if you practice them, to hell. This giving into the flesh led to his spiritual death. Keeping him in the church would lead to his self-satisfaction, with him practicing this sin with his mother/step mother. Only Paul's excommunication of him, as he said 'I judge', v. 3 can wake him up, as the church was lax. This is medicinal. The Church had to purge out the evil from the body (1 Cor. 5:7). The term 'may' shows it depends on what the incestual man does. It shows it is up in the air based on what he chooses. He chooses to go on committing incestual sin, he won't be saved, per 1 Cor, 6:9-11. If he comes to his senses and stops fornicating with his mother/step mother, then he will be forgiven and come back to the Church, and God himself, where he can be another prodigal son coming back to the faith. The time of the first letter is like David out of grace when he sinned with Bathsheba, and the Prodigal in the midst of his loose living. Paul is hoping his warning, will prompt the equivalent of David being restored back to God in 2nd Samuel 12:1-14 via Nathan, with Psalms 32 and 51 being the result, and the prodigal coming back in repentance to the Father, Luke 15:18-22.

By the time 2 Corinthians was written, the offender repented, and got accepted in the community. Here he specifically says that the one who committed the sexual act of immorality with his mother/step mother, had lots of grief. The community had to forgive him, Paul specifically forgave him, 2 Cor. 2:1-10. So, the act that Paul castigated him for in 1 Cor. 5, Paul noted had put him outside the grace, specifically one of the sins mentioned in 1 Cor. 6:9. He repented and was forgiven. Again, another example of someone being washed from sin, committing a grievous sin, but was required to repent, to be forgiven again. This is yet another example that you said did not exist in Scripture.

10. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORKS AND SALVATION

This principle to bear in mind is that if works are needed to keep salvation, then salvation is by works. Works is what separated Adam and Eve in the garden, to begin with. Faith is what brought them back to Him and faith in our redeemer is what is going to save us. In Romans 4:4-6 Paul said: Now to him that works, the reward is not reckoned as of grace, but as of debt. But to him that works not, but believes on him that justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned for righteousness. Even as David also pronounced blessing upon the man, unto whom God reckons righteousness apart from works.

I've already examined this passage in detail. Again, what he is condemning, the whole background to the Romans 4 passage is works of the law. Again, he does not say works done in grace, but works where one attempts to make God a debtor, as though he owes us. It is impossible to make God 'owe' us. If one believes, one must act on belief. Faith has to obey. It is truly God's grace and kindness that has to be the basis for obedience. However, in both Romans and Galatians it shows that faith is only effective when it works in love. Romans 5:4-6.

It is also referred to in Galatians 5:4-6, which not only shows how faith must work in love, but one can lose grace:

4 You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace. 5 For through the Spirit, by faith, we wait for the hope of righteousness. 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is of any avail, but faith working through love.
Notice if someone was in God's grace but tried to be justified by law in and of itself, one will not be saved. Those will be severed. You can only be severed, if you are in Christ, in the first place. However, what is the law he is talking about? Notice in v. 6 he talks about circumcision/uncircumcision. So, again he is talking about works of the law, which including the Judaizers who were trying to mandate one to be circumcised, who Paul earlier criticized. He specifically here mentions circumcision and uncircumcision avails nothing, again the Mosaic Law. Going back to that Mosaic Law only leads to damnation and severance from Christ. Faith doesn't work on its own. It is faith working through love, v. 6. Not faith alone. Faith, without love, means absolutely nothing, 1 Cor. 13:2. Absolutely impossible if faith alone achieves salvation. And notice again, back in verse 4 it specifically says if one goes by law, you have fallen away from grace, severed from Christ. That, in and of itself shows that one can lose salvation.

Also, obedience is shown to be absolutely essential in Romans and Galatians itself. Romans 6 for example tells us exactly that obedience is a cause of salvation. Exactly after Paul writes that we are under grace not law he writes that obedience is necessary for salvation. Romans 6:14-16

14 For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace. 15 What then? Are we to sin because we are not under law but under grace? By no means! 16 Do you not know that if you yield yourselves to any one as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness?
If you obey sin, it leads to death, and if obedient to Christ, it leads to righteousness. That is a separation from heaven and hell. We all have free will, we have the capacity to go back to sin. Now Paul writes that he is confident in them, but in 6:20-22 he writes:
20 When you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness. 21 But then what return did you get from the things of which you are now ashamed? The end of those things is death. 22 But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the return you get is sanctification and its end, eternal life.
We are truly called to be set free from sin. One must pursue sanctification, or holiness to attain eternal life. The end of sanctification is eternal life. It is not that the fruit of salvation is sanctification. But the reverse. Sanctification leads to eternal life. So, if you fall from sanctification you cut yourselves off from that, which I have documented through Paul, Jesus, Hebrews, and 1st John.

Confirmation of this exactly fits with Hebrews 12:14:

14 Strive for peace with all men, and for the holiness without which no one will see the Lord.
But back to Romans to show that the law, even though in and of itself is not salvific, is not done away with, Paul exactly proclaims that when he says in the beginning of Romans 8:2-4:
2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 in order that the just requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
This is right after saying there is no condemnation for those in him, 8:1. The law of sin and death, the Mosaic law, gave no power to keep the commandments. But in the Spirit, there is a law of the Spirit of life in Christ that we are in. Notice, specifically, we are adopted sons, we are not bound by the strict law, but we do have a law of the Spirit, so the law is not done away with. We can fulfill the just requirement of the law when we walk not according to the flesh but the Spirit. So, we have a battle of the flesh and the Spirit with eternal consequences, Romans 8:13:
13 for if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body you will live.
'You will die' means you will die, no way to get around it. Giving into the flesh leads to separation from God. So, our justification/salvation is based on what we do. The law is not done away with.
Galatians 2:21 "I do not make void the grace of God: for if righteousness is through the law (works), then Christ died for naught" .
Of course, law is not the way per se that one is saved. The law in and of itself provides no power to keep the commandments, in and of itself. But it is provided, by the law of the Spirit.

II Timothy 1:9: who saved us, and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before times eternal.
Let us look at the passage in context:
9 who saved us and called us with a holy calling, not in virtue of our works but in virtue of his own purpose and the grace which he gave us in Christ Jesus ages ago, 10 and now has manifested through the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel.
Again, works by our own power is worthless. Notice, it his purpose and grace. Grace is not merely God looking away from sin. Grace is a power. Verse 10 shows exactly what this grace does, it abolished death, by wiping out sin. Remember Jesus said John 15:5, 'apart from me you can do nothing.' When Christ came, he came to abolish death and bring life. Our power apart from grace is worthless. However, with it we are responsible, under his power of crucifying the flesh via the Holy Spirit. When we put on Our Lord Jesus Christ, what do we do? Not our own power, but the life of God is in us who follow him. Galatians 5:24, and Romans 13:14:
Galatians 5:24 And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.

Romans 13:14 But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

However, we are not robots, we still operate with free will. The whole thing is a process. Following this very passage in 2nd Timothy, Paul elaborates more on this very issue:
2 Tim. 2:3-5. 3 Share in suffering as a good soldier of Christ Jesus. 4 No soldier on service gets entangled in civilian pursuits, since his aim is to satisfy the one who enlisted him. 5 An athlete is not crowned unless he competes according to the rules.
So, remember law in and of itself gives us nothing, but in his grace, we still must suffer, and is salvific (see Romans 8:17). We still have to compete to attain our goal. We have to go by the rules (keeping the 10 commandments). Athletic reference reminds us of the 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 passage previously looked at.

Paul then emphasizes enduring as essential to achieve salvation in the following verse, 2 Tim. 2:12:

12 if we endure, we shall also reign with him; if we deny him, he also will deny us.
If we deny him, He denies us, a real possibility, otherwise Paul has no business writing this. So what Paul wrote in 2 Tim. 1:9 doesn't mean what we do after, doesn't affect our salvation. Only if we endure shall we reign with him. This matches what Jesus proclaimed, Matthew 24:33:
but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven.
So, the passages following 2 Timothy 1:9 speaks exactly against your conclusion.
So if works are necessary to keep salvation, then salvation is ultimately by works. Yet the Bible consistently teaches that salvation is by grace though faith and apart from works.

Of course, it is grace, however justification is apart from works of the law. Works without faith, useless. Faith working in love does achieve it as Paul documented, Gal. 5:4-6.

C. THE EVIDENCES FOR ETERNAL SECURITY

What are the evidences of eternal security? Since there are so much evidence of eternal security, let's begin with:

A. GOD THE FATHER

1. The sovereign Purpose of God

Romans 8:28-30 spells out one of these sovereign purposes of God, when Paul said those who have been justified (made righteous) will be glorified. He does not say only some who have been saved are going to persevere to the end and then make it; he does not say that only some who are justified will eventually be glorified. What is stated is that those who have been justified are guaranteed to be glorified by God the Father.

If one isolates this passage from the context one can possibly say that. Yes, Paul says one justified he glorifies. However, the whole chapter of Romans 8 speaks exactly to who is justified. One justified and stays justified will be glorified. Remember, only those who through the law of the spirit, and meet the righteousness of the law of the Spirit (Romans 8:2-4) by the way we live, stay justified. We must put to death the deeds of the flesh or we are condemned (already quoted), 8:13. What does he mean about being justified and glorified, he mentioned it just a few verses earlier (from 8:28-30), Romans 8:14-17:
8:14 For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. 15 For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the spirit of sonship. When we cry, "Abba! Father!" 16 it is the Spirit himself bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God, 17 and if children, then heirs, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him.
Remember, Paul just wrote that we have to put to death the deeds of the flesh in order to live, of course spiritually. We are His children and heirs only provided we suffer with him. We suffer with him in order to be glorified with him, v. 17. Paul's mention of 'provided' shows that it is provisional, and directly infers some do not suffer with him. This is exactly tied into this passage in Romans 8:28-30 about being glorified. Yes, you remain justified you will be glorified. One can unjustify oneself by 'not suffering'(*v 17), or not 'putting to the death the deeds of the flesh' (v. 13), or not meeting 'the righteous requirement of the law' of the Spirit (v. 4, v. 2) as Paul wrote in this very chapter! So, the meaning of the passage is that if one is justified at death, that person will be glorified.

I Corinthians 1:8 states God shall also confirm you unto the end, not temporal, but unto the end. This is a promise to all believers; that all believers will be confirmed in the end.
Okay, we have to talk about how exactly what Paul writes God is confirming. We need to look at what he means confirming to the end. You seem to be implying, well, there are no eternal consequences either if he does commit serious sins. I Corinthians 1:4, 7-8:
4 I give thanks to God always for you because of the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus---7 so that you are not lacking in any spiritual gift, as you wait for the revealing of our Lord Jesus Christ; 8 who will sustain you to the end, guiltless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.
He does sustain us for sure. Our own power is worthless. However, Paul doesn't write that every single believer will cooperate with this sustainment. What does he sustain us with? His gift, which is his grace. Christ gives us all the spiritual gifts, v. 7, later referred to in 1 Cor. 12. So, He gives us everything that we need to confront the evil that we face. That is what he is confirming. However, this sustenance does not override our free will. If we cooperate with that grace, that is when we will be guiltless in the day of our Lord. Now, in reference to judgment, we know that we can't make the judgment. It is only God who makes that judgment, not us. Paul says so in this very letter. 1 Cor. 4:4-5:
4 I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted. It is the Lord who judges me. 5 Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart.
God judges us, not ourselves. The passage in 1 Cor. 1:8 then does not show that Paul himself was meant to guarantee salvation for all those who have sincerely believed at one time. We've already seen Paul's warning to the Corinthians to not be deceived into thinking those sins just as adultery, homosexuality, thievery won't separate you from God (1 Cor. 6:9-11). One won't go to heaven if you go into such sins without repenting. As a believer, you want to stay away from those things, but as we have flesh and blood, there are temptation to fall into sins that can separate us from God.
The second area of evidence concerns eternal security for the reasons, which are dependent upon God the Son. Let's look at one of the crucial passages for making this point is Romans 8:34-39:
"who is he that condemns? It is Christ Jesus that died, yea rather, that was raised from the dead, who is at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword. Even as it is written, for your sake we are killed all the day long; we were accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
Here is his take on these verses, he actually summarizes chapter 8 without giving the verses themselves. But here is his take on the above verses:
Paul points out the incompetency of celestial and earthly things to keep one eternally. Believers do not have the power to keep themselves, so God is the One who is going to keep them. On the other hand, these verses emphasize further that there is nothing, absolutely nothing that can now separate us from the love of God. Nothing outside of us, nothing inside of us, not even we ourselves can separate us from the love of God.
This passage is not meant to conflict with the whole beginning of Romans 8. Things for sure that are exterior to us will not separate ourselves from God. Remember, we must still meet the righteous requirement of the law of the Spirit (8:4). Peril or persecution is not us sinning. Famine or anguish is not us sinning. That is something exterior happening to us. What we do, when we are faithful, we suffer, which Paul says that we have to do, in order to inherit salvation, Romans 8:17. He says nothing inside us can separate us from God. Absolutely none of the items identified are things that come from inside us. The passage which said that which can separate us from eternal life are the deeds of the flesh, which Paul specifically said one must put to death or else you do not get eternal life!!!

Jesus says the same thing that Paul writes in what causes separation from God, Matt 15:18-19

18 But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a man. 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander. 20 These are what defile a man; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man."
Murder, adultery, false witness, that defiles a man. This is what causes separation from God, exactly what Paul is referring to when he said in Rom. 8:13 that by the Spirit one must put to death the deeds of the flesh or you will not inherit eternal life. Paul writes if you do these things, they do separate you from eternal life (Gal. 5:17-19, 1 Cor. 6:9-10, Eph 5:5-6). These are things that you do, that come from one's own desires. So, in order for Romans 8 to fit the once saved always saved theology, Paul needs to write something like the following:
For I am persuaded, that neither adultery, nor fornication, nor idolatry, nor bearing false witness, nor drunkenness, nor homosexuality, shall be able to separate us from the love of God.
That is the passage you would have to point to, but then that would contradict what Paul taught elsewhere, as well as Jesus' own teaching. Those who hold it is possible to lose salvation do not argue that life/death/persecution/famine causes one to lose salvation. So, in effect this passage the way that Paul actually wrote it, has no bearing on the issue. It does not say what the Eternal Security proponents need it to say.
Furthermore, Ephesians 1:4, and 11-12 states that believers have chosen to bring glory to God. If God knew (and He knows) one would lose his salvation, He would not have chosen him to begin with. The very fact that it shows that He did; guarantees eternal security.
That doesn't follow. In a very passage that you referred to, Romans 8:28 says 'We know that in everything God works for good with those who love him, who are called according to his purpose.' Many things can be used by those who love him now and love him the rest of his/her life. In other words, if someone was a believer, and as a believer positively impacted an unbeliever that by the Spirit becomes a believer, there is fruit, glory comes to God, as the new believer becomes a Christian, even if the original person fell away, for example. Also, the passage itself does say that God provides protection, but that protection does not mean one can not walk away from God. Remember, he warns in Ephesians 5:3-7 that whatever he meant by being sealed, that if you do sinful actions you will be condemned, 'the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.' Traditionally the seal has been understood as baptism. Whether one accepts that or not, Ephesians 5:3-7, is a true Scripture. This is right after being talked about being sealed with the Holy Spirit, Ephesians 4:28 uses similar language as in Ephesians 1 about being sealed but then warns about sinning, leading to the Ephesians 5:3-7 passage. He is saying don't be deceived by the idea that because one is sealed by the Holy Spirit, it doesn't mean that you can't separate yourself from God by disobedient actions.
Ephesians 2:7 develops the sovereign purpose of God even further: that in the ages to come he might show the exceeding riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.

Those who have obtained the mercy of salvation from God in this life will receive even greater displays of God's mercy in the ages to come, in the next life. This promise is a guarantee of eternal salvation.

We've already looked at Ephesians 2:1-10 and following. It doesn't teach your interpretation of v. 7.
Philippians 2:12-13 states that God is working in believers to accomplish His will. Not only is the gaining of salvation a work of God, but the retention of salvation is a work of God. The reason salvation cannot be lost is because the keeping of salvation is not dependent upon the believer, it is dependent upon God the Father and His sovereign purpose.
It is God's power working through the man. It is both/and not either or. I've already shown the rest of the passage which shows one can lose salvation, but to achieve it, one must endure and be holy, and if not, it would have been in vain (vv. 14-16). Besides, yes, it is God at work within you, however, the reader, the Christian is also told for himself to work that salvation out. If it is one working it out, one is 'working it out.'
Another verse concerning His sovereign purpose is Hebrews 2:10, which speaks of His purpose in bringing many sons unto glory.
Yea, but many sons doesn't mean if you are once a son, you are guaranteed to stay a son. Just a few verses earlier he wrote, Hebrews 2:1-3:
1 Therefore we must pay the closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it. 2 For if the message declared by angels was valid and every transgression or disobedience received a just retribution, 3 how shall we escape if we neglect such a great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested to us by those who heard him.
Believers can drift away and neglect a great salvation and there will be a just retribution. He is not contradicting himself just a few verses later.
2. THE FATHER'S POWER TO KEEP

The fact that God the Father has the power to keep. This means that He will keep. John 10:25-29 points out that God will give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish. The ones who have been saved, not once, not twice or multiple times, but have been saved (period) have eternal life. And if the word eternal means anything, it means just that: it is eternal. If someone could lose his salvation, he did not have eternal life, he had only temporary life. John then emphasizes this fact even further with the next phrase. Not only does he state positively that God gives them eternal life, but then he also states negatively: they shall never perish. Never means never!

Again, this is the same thing that Paul wrote about in Romans 8. Nothing exterior can take you away from Jesus. The sheep are those who, present tense, listen and follow him. As long as they continue, listen and follow them, til the end of their lives, they will achieve Eternal Life. No one can snatch him doesn't mean that one can't defile himself by his own actions specifically as Jesus and Paul himself warned. Obviously if one does that, he is not his sheep because he is no longer listening and following as Jesus specifically says that one must do. Final salvation itself is ultimately achieved only once, but that is indeed once, but only when you die in a state of grace. Justification is the one that can be more than once, just like the prodigal son, David, and the young man in 1 Corinthians 5.

John 10 for example says nothing contrary to what Jesus himself warned against. For example, this is one of the verses I quoted in my list of Scriptures. Here James is speaking to his disciples, Matthew 5 :1, 'The disciples came to him'. Again, Jesus elsewhere warns that sins can send you to the hell-fire. Matthew 5:22:

But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, 'You fool!' shall be liable to the hell of fire.
This is how you yourself act, by anger, hate towards someone makes you liable to the hell-fire. Notice though, it is not someone snatching away. So, John 10:25-29 has absolutely no bearing on this passage because it is talking about different things. Again, just looking at that passage, John 10:27-28:
27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me; 28 and I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish, and no one shall snatch them out of my hand.
Who are the ones who will not perish? Oh, the sheep who hear his voice and follow him. It is present tense. So, it is a constant following of him. So, those who follow him and listen to him, will not be snatched away are those who constantly listen to him, follow, and if you are following him, you are obeying him. Yea, those ones who follow and by following that means obeying him will never be snatched away. However, if you fall into such things as anger, hatred towards someone and you don't repent of that hatred, you are not following him, and no longer his sheep.
Romans 4:21 states: and being fully assured that what he had promised, he was able to also perform. Since God has promised to keep the believer, He will do it.
It is only God's power that enables us, but we must cooperate, and we must be obedient, just as Abraham did, noted in Romans 4:21. If we disobey him, that disobedience leads to spiritual death (Rom. 6:16). Again, God does not violate our free will to disobey him if we so choose.
Romans 8:28-30 states that those whom He foreordained or predestinated, called, and justified will also be glorified. These passage makes it very clear that all those who have believed have been called and justified; therefore, these will also be glorified.
Already looked at.
II Timothy 1:12 teaches that He is able to keep that which has been committed. Believers have committed themselves to Him and now He is able to keep them; He has that power.

Hebrews 7:25 points out that believers have been saved (without limit) to the uttermost; God's power has saved completely (not partially saved). If salvation could be lost, then it was not a complete salvation, and God's power has a limit.

Of course, God has that power. But we've already looked at 2 Timothy and warnings are real, spelling out that people can lose their salvation. But believers have to stay committed to him, and God does not take away the freedom for us to choose other fleshly things over him. Hebrews 7 says that Jesus lives to make intercession for them constantly. The salvation is in the future, and Jesus intercedes for him, and provides grace so that one can run the race set before them. But the fact that he intercedes on behalf of the believer, it shows that salvation is not already wrapped up. Your interpretation does not fit the actual wording of Hebrews 7:25, here is the actual quote:
Consequently, he is able for all time to save those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them.
Your take on it that he wrote 'believers have been saved.' Your analysis was based on that, that was not a correct translation, I looked at RSV, NIV, NKJV, KJV, NASB, NAB, On the contrary Hebrews 7:25, says, 'to save'. So, to save is in the future. He lives to make intercession. Why would he have to intercede for the salvation, if one's salvation was guaranteed? It is not.
One more example of God's power to keep is in Jude 24, which teaches with all confidence that God is able to keep the believer from stumbling and present him faultless before the throne.
Of Course, God is able to keep the believer from stumbling. Remember it is God at work within you. Apart from Christ we can do nothing. It doesn't mean that we don't have free will to turn our back on Christ. All of Jude warns believers to stay faithful and Jude 4-6 shows that one can lose salvation, just as Paul did in 1 Corinthians 10, but I'll look at Jude's take on that in part 2. But here, Jude indeed gives a warning of falling away. All of Jude 1-19 warns people to stay away from false teachers, it is a real warning. Just before Jude 24, Jude writes the way to stay faithful, in verses 20-21:
20 But you, beloved, build yourselves up on your most holy faith; pray in the Holy Spirit; 21 keep yourselves in the love of God; wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
Notice the way that that God keeps the believer from stumbling is when the believer builds up in the holy faith, prays in the Holy Spirit, perseveres in the love, and wait for the future, unto eternal life. Again, eternal life is in the future, it depends on the believer to keep oneself, but only with God's help. The believer waits for the Lord Jesus' mercy, that is how God keeps the believer from stumbling. If one does not persevere in keeping yourselves in love, one can fall, as noted in Jude 4-6.
The book of James seems to be one of controversy to the Paul's teaching regarding faith. This extreme view, called antinomianism, held that through faith in Christ one is completely free from all Old Testament law, all legalism all secular law and all the morality of a society. The book of James is directed to Jewish Christians scattered among all the nations (James 1:1). Some people fail to recognize that James teachings on works complemented - - not contradicted - - Paul's teaching of faith. Having said that; the Pauline teachings concentrate on our justification with God, James teachings concentrate on the works that exemplify that justification. James was writing to Jews to encourage them to continue growing in this new Christian faith. James emphasizes that good actions will naturally flow from those who are filled with the Spirit and questions whether someone may or may not have a saving faith if the fruits of the spirit cannot be seen, much as Paul describes in Galatians 5:22-23.
I in no way say that Paul contradicts James. The fact that James is writing to Jewish Christians may indeed have a different emphasis, however, when Paul writes in Romans and Galatians as well, for the most part he is speaking to Jewish Christians as well. Paul is talking about the means of justification, but so is James. I don't grant that in Galatians 5:22-23 Paul is only speaking about the fruit of salvation. Because he is talking about salvation itself. Yes, the fruit of the Spirit, is love, joy, faithfulness, self- control, etc. He talks about the battle of the flesh and the spirit, exactly as we saw in Romans 8. However, Paul here is not merely talking about sanctification, on how to get extra rewards in heaven, which seems to be your assumption. He is talking about those practicing anger, sorcery, impurity, fornication, drunkenness, do not get into heaven, Galatians 5:19-21. Those who are faithful, and have love, not hate, have patience, the exact result is that you will inherit the kingdom of heaven. In other words, the bad actions will cause you to be disinherited from entering heaven. He warns that if you do those actions and don't repent from such sins, you are on the way to hell. So, the contrast is then, yes fruits of the Spirit, but those fruits especially show that they are necessary, as a means to achieve heaven because if you have those fruits, that will stop you from doing the sinful actions that cause one to be disinherited. Paul writes in 5:24:
And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
The issue is what one needs to do get or not get eternal life. So, I agree that James 2 and Galatians 5 are indeed speaking about the same issue, however, the issue is that they are both talking about justification and what is necessary for salvation. Now, let's actually look at the essential passage in James 2 and see if he is talking about merely the fruit of salvation, or justification which leads to final salvation.

In his letter Paul writes to Jews that works of the law do not provide salvation (Romans 3-4, Galatians 2-4). James says the same thing, if you go strictly by law, you will not be justified, James 2:10. That is why before he gets to the pivotal passage of James 2:20-26, he talks about the law of liberty, James 2:12, very comparable to the law of the Spirit, Romans 8:4, where we can meet the righteous requirement of the law. And as we are children of God, as Hebrews 12 notes, we do not have to be perfect. If you go strictly by law, one will not inherit eternal life with one small sin, James 2:10. Instead we are in the law of liberty, James 2:12-13. 12 So speak and so act as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty. 13 For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy; yet mercy triumphs over judgment. Next, James then talks about faith and what kind of faith you need to be saved. What kind of faith will save you, James asks in 2:14? He next then says if one, a Christian, ignores a brother in need, that faith is dead (v. 17). Thus, it exactly matches Jesus' words where what one did, gets the result of heaven or hell based on what that person did (Matt. 25:31-46). That is the background for the essential passage of James 2:20-26:

20 a) Do you want to be shown, you shallow man, that faith apart from works is barren?
----------- 21 b) Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?
---------------------- 22 c) You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by works,
----------------------------------------23 d) and the scripture was fulfilled which says, "Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness"; and he was called the friend of God.
---------------------- 24 c) You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.
----------- 25 b) And in the same way was not also Rahab the harlot justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?
26 a) For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead.
James writes this passage, verses 20 through 26, in a chiasm. That is a form of literature, where the author uses language in order to focus on a specific teaching. His point is to drive whatever the teaching is home. It is symmetrical, and repetitive just so we can grasp this teaching. We see here in James 2:20-26, this chiasm is shown by symmetry. I have this chiasm shown as we see the structure of the chiasm in verses 20-26, highlighted in matching colors, with the structure going, a, b, c, d, c, b, a. We have in order, repetition of some main points of James. James repeats the teaching twice basically to drive home the point of his teaching, just so we can grasp what he is getting across. Your idea that he's talking about just exemplifying, or only demonstrating justification doesn't recognize James' chiasms. James shows that his whole purpose (a) is to show, (verses 20, and 26), that faith apart from works is dead. In other words, faith, in and of itself is insufficient in the goal of attaining salvation. Not faith alone, as after all, without works, it accomplishes nothing. What in fact is James showing? As we proceed, we see how one is justified. Next, (b), we see that James driving home the point twice (in verses 21 and 25, perfectly symmetrical), that Abraham and Rahab are justified by works. If we didn't get the point in verse 21, we see that James getting across to us, that both Abraham and Rahab are justified by works, and these are perfect examples to instruct us on how one is justified. Now, neither v. 21, nor v. 25 even hint at exemplifying anything except how one is justified before God. Instead, James both in verse 21 and 25 show that works are a cause of justification. If we didn't understand it the first time through Abraham, James drives home the point twice, again in perfect symmetry, with the example of Rahab. Just as Abraham is called justified by works, so is Rahab. Next, (c), in verses 22 and 24, James further shows that faith alone is insufficient for salvation. In v. 22, James specifically says that faith is completed by works. Faith alone is insufficient, James teaches. In order to justify, faith must be active along with works. Works is not merely a qualifier of faith. Faith must work in cooperation with works in order to achieve that justification. The matching verse, v. 24, perfectly symmetrical to v. 22, drives home this very same point in a more forceful manner. James specifically writes that faith alone does not justify, and that we are justified by works (which he had just shown us symmetrically with Abraham and Rahab). He specifically negates the faith alone idea not only in v. 22, but even more forcefully in v. 24 when he says that we are not justified by faith alone. Finally, with these verses repeated and surrounding this, in the center of the chiasm, v. 23, James points us back to Genesis 15, where Abraham believed that God would provide a son for Abraham. He says that the offering of Isaac back in James 2:21 (Gen. 22) fulfilled Genesis 15. Thus, the justification of Abraham in Genesis 22 fulfills Genesis 15. We see that in Genesis 15, Abraham is called a friend of God. The basis for justification is not a legal decree. But it is in covenant with God. Thus, any appeal to Genesis 15 shows that justification was not a one-time event, but an ongoing matter. In Abraham's life, he needed to put his faith into action to continue to be justified, and in Genesis 22, he was again justified. That is how his faith was completed. Thus, any appeal to Genesis 15, according to James, does not speak to the full matter of how Abraham was justified. We saw exactly this matches Paul's understanding of Romans 4. Yes, he was justified in Genesis 15 by his belief, but in fact his justification is continuous, and Abraham needed to be justified again in Genesis 22. His offering of Isaac on the altar shows this. After all, as just noted, his faith needed to be completed (James 2:22). Thus, the act of Genesis 15 did not complete Abraham's justification. In James 2:23, James lets us know that the offering of Isaac completed Abraham's faith that he had in Genesis 15. Works thus are necessary to complete this faith.

In sum, through this chiasm James repeats several things:

1) a) Without works faith will not accomplish anything but a dead soul (vv. 20, 26).
2) b) Abraham and Rahab are justified by works (vv. 21, 25), not merely demonstrate faith.
3) c) One is justified by works, as even a true faith alone is incomplete (vv. 22, 24).
4) d) At the center of the chiasm, James shows through Abraham that his justification in Genesis 15 was incomplete as it needed to be fulfilled by his work in Genesis 22 , which we saw was further complemented by the example of Rahab, v. 25.

Thus, the argument that it is only speaking of "exemplifying, or demonstrating justification" contradicts not only the words of James 2:21, but the accompanying verse 25. Faith alone is incomplete, according to James. Also, the other idea that Paul is talking about justification before God and implying that James is not talking about justification before God is contradicted by the offering of Isaac, because the offering of Isaac was not shown to anybody other than God, Genesis 22:14-18. This is not justification before men, there was no one who watched this except God (and his angel).

So besides the sovereign purpose of God, a second reason dependent upon God the Father is the Father's power to keep.

3. GOD'S INFINITE LOVE

Romans 5:7-10 states that, if God sent His Son to die for us when we were His enemies, He would certainly keep us now that we are His friends. The love of God was proved by the sending of His Son to die for our sins while we were His enemies. If God was willing to provide salvation when we were His enemies, the love of God will make sure that He is going to keep us now that we are His friends.

Furthermore, Ephesians 1:4 states that we have been chosen in love. By His love, He has chosen us in order to keep us.

4. THE PROMISE OF GOD

The fourth reason dependent upon God the Father for eternal security is based upon the promise of God who always keeps his promises. God made a specific promise of eternal security and the promises of God can never be rendered null and void. John 3:16 states that "the believer" will not perish. If a believer could lose his salvation and end up in Hell, then obviously a believer can perish, which would render God a liar by not keeping his promise. But according to this passage, once a person has accepted Jesus as his Savior, he simply will not perish.

If you believe. When Jesus says, whosever believes in Christ, he doesn't pour this assumption into that at all. He doesn't say once one believes, one is guaranteed that he will always believe to the end of his days and act on that belief. For the once saved always saved theory, that is what Jesus needs to say, and he doesn't. It is an ongoing process. Steve Ray goes over the tense, Steve Ray John 3:16 and eternal Security

"For God so loved [aorist, a past point in time] the world, that he gave [aorist, a past point in time] his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth [present, current, progressive action] in him should not perish [aorist, a past point in time], but have [present, current, progressive action] everlasting life."

The present tense, "that whosoever believeth in him," or in other words, "that whosoever is believing in Him" sheds a different light on the entire verse. One would expect, according to Protestant tradition, the word "believe" to be aorist, showing that it is a "one-point-in-time" event. I used to say, "I believed in Christ on such and such a date, so I know I am saved." It could be asked why Jesus switched to the present tense in a verse full of aorists. The answer is that Jesus makes it utterly clear what he is really trying to say; that this belief is an acting, continual belief, and not just a past act of faith.

Notice that "have everlasting life" is also in the present tense. It does not say you will have eternal life in the past or future, but that you will currently be having eternal life. One Greek grammar [James Hewitt, New Testament Greek Hedrickson Publishers,1986).13.] explains the present tense in this way, "The present tense is basically linear or durative, ongoing in its kind of action. The durative notion may be expressed graphically by an unbroken line, since the action is simply continuous. This is known as the progressive present. Refinements of this general rule will be encountered; however, the fundamental distinction will not be negated." Applying this definition here, he who is currently, habitually and continuously believing will be currently and presently having eternal life.

Next, I asked him to consider whether the word translated "believe" means a mere mental assent. The word in biblical times carried with it the concept of obedience and reliance. Kittel [Gerhard Kittel, Theological Dictionary of the NewTestament Eerdmans, 1968] states, "pisteuo means 'to trust' (also 'to obey')." Vines [W. E. Vines, An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1984)] says, "[R]eliance upon, not mere credence." .

So, this very passage makes a distinction in tenses that point to believing, relying continuously. Not that one made a salvation prayer, or had true faith, at one point in time, and you are guaranteed to have eternal life. Salvation is only guaranteed when you believe, until the end of time, and die with such belief, and obey.

We know elsewhere Jesus specifically says that one can believe for a while, and fall away, Luke 8:13

And the ones on the rock are those who, when they hear the word, receive it with joy; but these have no root, they believe for a while and in time of temptation fall away.
Thus, one can fall away from the Word of God, and fall away from salvation. So, when Jesus says when one believes, it is a constant belief, from now to the end of time. If one is tempted, one can give into that temptation and fall away. So, when Jesus says this in John 3:16 or 5:24, He is not saying once you believe, you automatically are set for life. God of course keeps his promise, however, one needs to persevere in belief at the time of one's death.

Then John 5:24 teaches that the believer has already passed from death into life. The promise is that we already have eternal life, because we have passed from spiritual death to spiritual life, and spiritual life is eternal life. The Scriptures always emphasize that believers have eternal life at the present time. If salvation could be lost, it was not eternal, but only temporary. Scripture does not state that salvation is temporary. When we accept Jesus as our savior, we have been spiritually reborn again at the time that you genuinely accept Jesus as your Savior. Scripture does not state that you need to be reborn again and again until you get it perfect. (You'll never get it perfect) . For those who state that you can lose your salvation are really meaning to say that either (they were never truly saved (not losing their salvation), or they want to judge people, according to their own standards of salvation, as to who and when one should be considered saved. One should rely on scripture only and not on man's doctrine(s).
The idea in John 5:24 means you are guaranteed eternal life if you believe at one point in time, misuses the meaning of the words Jesus uses and the surrounding context. John who of course heard these words uses the exact same language in his epistle to exactly show that your interpretation is not what Jesus meant. The same tense, which is documented in John 3:16 is present in the passage in John 5:24. So, a continuous belief, you will continue to have eternal life. Besides that, He isn't speaking of belief only. The context helps to give a better overall look at John 5:24, 5:24-29:
24 Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears my word and believes him who sent me, has eternal life; he does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life. 25 "Truly, truly, I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. 26 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself, 27 and has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of man. 28 Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice 29 and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.
Those who believe, must act on this belief. Notice just a few verses later it specifically gives another criteria. Not faith only. Jesus is the Judge, he executes judgment, those in the tombs, will get that eternal life only if they do good. Exactly as Jesus said in Matthew 25:31-46. Exactly as Paul wrote in Romans 2:6-13. Exactly as Paul wrote in 2 Cor. 5:10. One must believe to the end, and act on that belief. The one who believes for a while, as we just saw in Luke, who falls away won't get that eternal life. In the section you mentioned about 1 John 3, I went over in detail, please see above. We saw the epistle of John, using the exact same language that Jesus used saying that when we pass from death to life, John reiterates it is 'because he loved the brethren', and if one hates a brother, that person is a murderer and cuts one off from salvation (1 John 3:14-15).

In Hebrews 6:16-19, the writer based his argument upon the promise of God and the oath of God. As if the promise of God were not enough, God added His oath to the promise. The content of the promise and oath is that believers are going to be kept safe.
But what did Hebrews 6 itself say? What is the promise that Hebrews 6 writes of?
4 For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt. 7 For land which has drunk the rain that often falls upon it, and brings forth vegetation useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God. 8 But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed; its end is to be burned.
If one is enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, partakers of the Holy Spirit and tasted the goodness of the word of God and commits apostasy, they hold the Son of God to contempt. If they commit apostasy, and in effect stay in apostasy, they will be condemned. Those ones who partook of all that goodness, and stay in apostasy, they won't come back. You commit apostasy you will be condemned. This precedes the passage that says that God will keep to his promise. In part two, I will examine your look at Hebrews 6, where you say that the passage does not teach one can lose salvation.

RETURN

Go to Part 2


RETURN

Return to Matt's Salvation Page


RETURN

Go to Matt's Catholic Apologetics Page

Matt's Response to an Essay That Teaches Faith Alone and Eternal Security...by Matt1618 ... This text may be downloaded or printed out for private reading, but it may not be uploaded to another Internet site or published, electronically or otherwise, without express written permission from the author.


Work completed on Saturday, March 17, 2018